Queue Lengths in TTM: Predicting, Monitoring, and Managing End-of-Queue Hazards
- Adam Gardiner
- May 27
- 2 min read

Introduction
In roadwork zones, queue lengths are more than an inconvenience – they’re a leading cause of high-speed crashes. End-of-queue (EOQ) collisions often involve inattentive drivers and occur with little warning.
AGTTM explicitly addresses this risk, requiring designers and planners to forecast, monitor, and mitigate queue build-up. Here's how to do it properly.
Why Queue Lengths Matter
When vehicles are forced to stop or slow unexpectedly:
Drivers often fail to notice queues in time
Heavy vehicles have longer braking distances
Rear-end collisions become severe, especially above 60 km/h
Reference: AGTTM03-21, Section 4.8.4; AGTTM10-21, Section 2.4.3
How to Estimate Queue Lengths
AGTTM provides general guidance but not a fixed formula. Practical methods include:
Historical data or previous site observations
Peak hour traffic modelling
Site inspection for congestion indicators (e.g. nearby intersections, school zones)
As a rule of thumb, any queue over 150 m on roads 70 km/h and above is considered high risk.
Monitoring Queue Build-Up
Queue conditions can change quickly. Effective monitoring includes:
Visual observations by field staff
Use of CCTV or radar sensors
Instructions in TMP for how to report and respond to queues
In Queensland, QGTTM requires specific monitoring triggers to be defined in the TMP.
Reference: QGTTM Part 3, Section 4.8.3
Devices for Queue Protection
End-of-Queue (EOQ) Protection Options:
Portable Variable Message Signs (VMS): "QUEUED TRAFFIC AHEAD"
Advance warning signage at extended distances
Additional tail vehicle with arrow board
Use of rumble strips (where appropriate)
Reference: AGTTM03-21, Sections 4.8.4 and 5.8
Buffer and Taper Considerations
If your queue estimate suggests significant stacking, AGTTM recommends:
Extending advance warning area
Including a longer taper or shoulder refuge zone
Placing Truck Mounted Attenuators (TMAs) at risk zones
Reference: AGTTM03-21, Section 4.5 and 5.5.3
Real-World Tip
Tail vehicle positioning is critical. It should sit at the back of the queue, not the start of the taper, during high-volume phases.
Also, VMS boards are only effective when placed well before the queue starts – not at the taper entry.
What Auditors Look For
Was queue length discussed in the TMP?
Is there EOQ monitoring and response protocol?
Are devices and buffer zones scaled for the speed zone and traffic volume?
Neglecting queues is one of the top findings in post-incident reviews.
Final Word
Queue management is not about adding more cones. It’s about foreseeing the danger and managing expectations.
Every queue can be predicted, monitored, and managed – and every planner has the tools to do it.
Comments